Case Law › High Court › Wp/16126/2022 Of Bhagwan Das Mangal v. I...

Wp/16126/2022 Of Bhagwan Das Mangal v. Income Tax (Central) Gwalior

High Court 14 Oct 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_gwl

Parties

Date of order

14 Oct 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/16126/2022 Of Bhagwan Das Mangal v. Income Tax (Central) Gwalior, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as being infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT GWALIORBEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAKON THE 14[th] OF OCTOBER, 2022WRIT PETITION No. 16126 of 2022 BETWEEN:- BHAGWAN DAS MANGAL S/O LATE SH HAZARILALMANGAL, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCCUPATION:RETIRED GOVT SERVENT KOTWALI SANTAR MORARGWALIOR (BY SHRI PAWAN DWIVEDI - ADVOCATE ) .....PETITIONER AND INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GWALIOR THE ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER STATIONED AT BHOPAL ROOM NO.111 AYAKAR BHAWAN HOSANGABAB ROAD (BY SHRI D.P.S. BHADOURAIYA - ADVOCATE ) .....RESPONDENT This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER In view of the order dated 12.10.2022 passed by the respondent/authority, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as being infructuous. (RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE (ANAND PATHAK)JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.