Wp/1614/2008 Of P.deepthi Reddy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/1614/2008 Of P.deepthi Reddy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/1614/2008 Of P.deepthi Reddy v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of above, Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
[ [32ss ]I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
ANO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 1514 OF 2008
Between:P. Deepthi Reddy, D/o. M. Kamala Reddy, Occ:H.R. Manager, C/o. FlatNo.304, Lorven Appartments Vegetable Market Road, Nallakunta, Hyd.
..PETITIONER
AND1.Commissioner of lncome Tax, (Computer Operations) 34, lT Towers. A.CGuards, Hyd.2Directorate of lncome Tax (Systems), ARA Cenke, Ground Floor, E-2Jhandewalam Extension, New Delhi-1 10055.3M/s. Karvy Consultants, Karvy House, 1st Floor, Road No.10. Banlara Hills.Hvd
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecrrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may becrrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus declaring that the action of the first and second respondents asrefusing to accept the petitioner's application for PAN Card on the ground thatshe has given only her Mother's name and not her father's Name for the purposeof identification is arbitrary, discriminatory and u nconstilutronal and furtherdirecting the respondents to receive the application of the petitioner and issueher PAN card without insisting on given her father's nameof identification is arbitrary, discriminatory and u nconstilutronal and furtherdirecting the respondents to receive the application of the petitioner and issueher PAN card without insisting on given her father's name
s,f,{:
I
zl,A. NO: I oF 2008tWP!{P-No: 1998 oF 2008}
Petition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the respondents to accept the petitioner's application for PAN card withoutinsisting on giving tt'e father's name.
Counsel for the Pet tioner : Ms. VASUDHA NAGARAJCounsel for the Res pondent No's 1 & 2 : SRl. B NARASIMHA SARMA SC FORINCOIIIE TAX DEPARTMENT
Counsel for the Respondent 3 : SRl. ROHAN AI.OORThe Court made the following: ORDER
,{
:'
{l-t
{a
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.1614 of 2O08
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhugan)
Heard Ms. Vasudha Nagaraj, learned counsel lor thepetitioner and Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Standing Counsel,Income Tax Department for respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reliefsought for by the petitioner has been granted by respondent Nos.1& 2. Therefore, no grievance subsists.
3. In view of above, Writ Petition is disposed of. However,there shall be no order as to costs.
4. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this WritPetition shali stand closed
SD/.K.AMMAJIASSISTANT //TRUE y1..-(l;r\i"\SECTION [OFFIbER.]
To,1Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax' ][(Computer Operations) ][34 ][lT ][Towers'A ][C]2S#Si?,iltf"t [lncome ][rax(Svstems)' ]f$lpentre' [Ground ][Floor ] in""""i!'iir# [r ][itension ][Ne';v Delhi-1 ][1 ][0055]3l,niLt'; [sRi ][d ][r'rnnnsrrt,tHn ][snnvn ][sc ][FoR ][INCoME ][rAX]NF PARTM E NTAlvo6Jeu8 [ucr]45slffi [ s: [xa=-1R-i,-tstffi* ]6Two CD [CoPies]KARBS?
HIGH COURT
DATED:2511112022
ORDERWP.No.1614 [crf ][2008]
DISPOSING [PETI'TION]
WITHOUT CCISTSEq'*5o2.6[\\][+"-]
e [T,1rA] o^c0 6 Jffir 2fl23r lir'9sep
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.