Wp/1616/2006 Of M. Z. Rehman v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And 3 Ors
High Court
05 Sep 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1616/2006 Of M. Z. Rehman v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And 3 Ors
Date of order
05 Sep 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/1616/2006 Of M. Z. Rehman v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And 3 Ors, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn.No order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1616 OF 2006
M.Z. Rehman .. Petitioner.
V/s.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Mumbai & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Chirag balsara with Mr.Jitendra Jain i/by Negandhi
shah & Himayatullah for the petitioner.
Mr.A.M. Kotangale for the respondents.
CORAM :H,L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2006.
P.C. :
1. In view of the order passedby us today in Income
Tax Appeal No.246 of 2006, Mr.Balsara does not press
this writ petition which seeks to challenge the
subsequent order passed by the Tribunal on an
application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act,
1961.
2. The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn.No
order as to costs.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue