Wp/16225/2013 Of Smt.kosanam Kasturi Bai v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
14 Nov 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/16225/2013 Of Smt.kosanam Kasturi Bai v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/16225/2013 Of Smt.kosanam Kasturi Bai v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 16225 OF 2013
DATE: 14.11.2013
Between:
Smt. Kosanam Kasturi Bai
… Petitioner
And
Income Tax Officer,Vijayawada, Krishna District& another.
… Respondents
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 16225 OF 2013
ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
In our view this writ petition should not be entertained, as an effectiveand alternative remedy is available to the petitioner. The petitioner would befree to prefer an appeal and it would be open for him, if so advised, to makean application for condonation of delay setting out the grounds. On receipt ofsuch application the appellate authority shall obviously look into the sameand pass appropriate order. All points are kept open.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall standclosed.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
____________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue