Wp/16237/2023 Of Jupally Real Estate Developers Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH TWO THOUSAND AND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE [SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI] LA.NO.3 0F 2023INWRIT PETITI ON NO: [16237 ][0F ][2023] Between: Juoallv Real Estate [Developers ][Private Limited, ][1-1 ][23, 8th ][Floor' ][3rd ],9lock'i;"ii8 ?g". M;-i"m" nuo, ti,tadhapur, [Hyderabad - 500081,represented ][by ][its]oirector Sri Jdpally [Vinod, S/o. Jupally Rameswar Rao, Aged about ][41 ][Years']R/o. Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ' Dv. Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax, Central Circle.- ][2 ][(.1 ][), ][Room ][No. ][612' ][6th]Friioi, Aavakar Bhavan, BasheerBagh, Hyderabad'Friioi, Aavakar Bhavan, BasheerBagh, Hyderabad' 2. Dy- Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax, Circle 2(1), Signature ][Towers' ][Hyderabad] 3. lncome Tax Officer, [Ward 2(1), Signature Towers, Hyderabad'] 4. lncome Tax Officer, [Ward 3(1), Signature Towers, Hyderabad'] ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section [151 ] [praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated]in the affidavit filed [in ][support ][of the petition, the ][High ][Court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to]passanordermodifyingthefinalorderdated2TloT12023passedinW.P.No.l623Tot2023byincorporatingRespondentNo.linsteadofRespondentNo.2. This petition coming [on ][for ][hearing, upon perusing the petition and affidavit]filed in support thereof [and ][upon ][reading ][the ][order ][daled ][27107 ][12023 ][in]W.P.No.16237 OF [2023 ][' and ][upon ][hearing ][the ][arguments ][of]tvl/s. R.S.ASSOCIATES, [on ][behalf ][of ][Petitioner ][and ][of ][M/s' ] CHOUDARY, SR. SC FOR TNCOME TAX DE'ARTITIENT for Resp()ndents, theCourt made the following. ORDERCourt made the following. ORDER This application filed seeking modification of the order dated 27r0712023 in W.P.No.1623t of 2023. The modification sought for is to the extent that inadvertenry in the course of passing of the order in paragraph No.5 the status of assessingofficer has been reftected as respondent No.2 instead of responderrt No.1.on due consideration' we are of the considered opinion that the instantapplication does need to be allowed. Accordingly, the present l.A. standsofficer has been reftected as respondent No.2 instead of responderrt No.1.on due consideration' we are of the considered opinion that the instantapplication does need to be allowed. Accordingly, the present l.A. standsallowed, modifying the order in paragraph No.5 where the status .f assessingofficer has been refrected as the respondent No.2, it wourd be read asassessingofficer has been refrected as the respondent No.2, it wourd be read asrespondent No.1. Considering the error that has crept in passing ,rfihe order,the period prescribed for the compriance of the order wourd now standsenhanced for a further period of four (04) weeks from today. SD/-,,.PRATHIMAASSISTANT REGISTBAR //TRUE COPYII sEcIoN #r,"=* To, 16th Floor, AayakarBhavar, The Dy. Commissioner of tncome Tax, grst Central Circle _ -2(.t), Room No. 612,2"Lig;bf,-ri;;erIH; IIE#;ff,,issioner [or ][i;;;; ][ra;:il;rt?;):tisnature ][rora,ers,]2"Lig;bf,-ri;;erIH; IIE#;ff,,issioner [or ][i;;;; ][ra;:il;rt?;):tisnature ][rora,ers,] 3The lncome Tax Officer wrrq?fil, 4The lncome Tax Officer. WQignature Towers, HyderabaJ.56.plEr-uuriiarhHf ['8fHd'i'ftitfi ]Q"#fEJ'.::T:';^4The lncome Tax Officer. WQignature Towers, HyderabaJ.56.plEr-uuriiarhHf ['8fHd'i'ftitfi ]Q"#fEJ'.::T:';^DEPARTMENT IOPUClTwo CD Copies [']Two CD Copies [']BSRclcl HIGH COURT DATED: 1510912023 -r 1-=:=:---,,,'-,,-\l'! -.--- [s ][i,la..]c,^ORDER/l.A.No.3 ot 2023? [g ] INWP.No.tO237 ot 2023 ALLOWING THE I.A.