Case LawHigh Court › Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering...

Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Jul 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Granting liberty as soughtthis writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.16423 OF 2010 28 JULY 2010. BETWEEN: M/S.DODLA ENGINEERING,3/454, LAKSHMIPURAM, NELLOREREP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERDODLA SESHA REDDY, S/OCHENCHURAMI REDDY,NELLORE DISTRICT .. PETITIONER AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE I,NELLOREAND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAMAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.16423 OF 2010 O R D E R:(Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAM) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner seeks towithdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a more comprehensive writpetition with regard to the grievances urged herein. Granting liberty as soughtthis writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Dt:28-07-2010. ( G.RAGHURAM, J ) ( R.KANTHA RAO, J ) TNB THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.16423 OF 2010 O R D E R:(Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAM) Dt: 28-07-2010.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan