Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 Jul 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/16423/2010 Of M/S. Dodla Engineering v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Granting liberty as soughtthis writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.16423 OF 2010
28 JULY 2010.
BETWEEN:
M/S.DODLA ENGINEERING,3/454, LAKSHMIPURAM, NELLOREREP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERDODLA SESHA REDDY, S/OCHENCHURAMI REDDY,NELLORE DISTRICT .. PETITIONER
AND
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE I,NELLOREAND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAMAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.16423 OF 2010
O R D E R:(Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAM)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner seeks towithdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a more comprehensive writpetition with regard to the grievances urged herein. Granting liberty as soughtthis writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Dt:28-07-2010. ( G.RAGHURAM, J )
( R.KANTHA RAO, J )
TNB
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.16423 OF 2010
O R D E R:(Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.RAGHURAM)
Dt: 28-07-2010.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.