Wp/16988/2014 Of Westglobe Limited v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/16988/2014 Of Westglobe Limited v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/16988/2014 Of Westglobe Limited v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT
-WRIT PETITION NO.16988/2014(IIT)C/W -WRIT PETITION NO.16984/2014(IIT)
W.P.NO.16988/2014BETWEEN:
WESTGLOBE LIMITED (A NON RESIDENT COMPANY) C/O MULTICONSULT LTD LES CASCADES BUILDING EDITH CAVELL ST., PORT LOUIS MAURITIUS, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI GYANESHWARNATH GOWREA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE MAHENDRANATH GOWREA
(BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI., ADVOCATE)
... PETITIONER
AND:
1 . THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE- 2 (1) RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 6 FLOOR, NO. 14/3 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001
2. THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 6 FLOOR, NO. 14/3 NRUPATHNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001
3. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISRY OF FINANCE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ASG FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER'S CASE AND AFTER EXAMINING THE LEGALITY AND VALIDITY THEREOF TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11[ ]OCTOBER 2013 BEING ANN-J RESTRAIN THE R-1 & 2 FROM PROCEEDINGS FURTHER IN THE MATTER OF RECOVERY OF IMPUGNED DEMAND OF RS.583,45,93,622/- FROM THE PETITIONER IN PURSUANCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ORDER DATED 11.10.2013 VIDE ANN-J AND ETC.
AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11[ ]
HERETO,
W.P.NO.16984/2014
BETWEEN:
RICHTER HOLDING LIMITED (A NON RESIDENT COMPANY) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.66, IPPOCRATOUS STREET P.C 1015 NICOSIA, CYPRUS
REPRESENTED BY ITS LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI DEEPAK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O SRI BADRI PRASAD TIBREWAL
(BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI., ADVOCATE)
... PETITIONER
AND:
1 . THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE- 2 (1) (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE- 2 (1)
RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 6 FLOOR, NO. 14/3 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001
2. THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 6 FLOOR, NO. 14/3 NRUPATHNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 6 FLOOR, NO. 14/3 NRUPATHNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001
3. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISRY OF FINANCE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ASG FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER'S CASE AND AFTER EXAMINING THE LEGALITY AND VALIDITY THEREOF TO QUASH
AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11 OCTOBER 2013 BEING ANN-L HERETO, RESTRAIN THE R-1 & 2 FROM PROCEEDINGS FURTHER IN THE MATTER OF RECOVERY OF IMPUGNED DEMAND OF RS.875,18,90,433/- FROM THE PETITIONER IN PURSUANCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ORDER DATED 11.10.2013 VIDE ANN-L AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR HEARING,
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING/PHYSICAL HEARING THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri. Parthasarathi, learned advocate for petitioners in
both the petitions has filed memos dated 24.11.2021
seeking leave to withdraw these petitions.
2. Leave granted. Writ petitions are dismissed as
withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SSD
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.