Wp/16990/2017 Of Google India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Jun 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/16990/2017 Of Google India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/16990/2017 Of Google India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|DATED THIS THE 2[nd]DAY OF JUNE 201/7
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN|;;Writ Petition Nos.16990991/2017(TIT)
between
Google India Private Limited,No.3, RMZ Infinity, Tower E,1[)2]Floor, Old Madras Road,Bangalore — 560 O16.Represented herein by its,Senior Corporate Counsel,Mr.Thirumalesn Gangappa.
Petitioner.
(By Ms. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate forSri. V.Vinay Giri, Advocate)
And
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,(International Taxation) Circie-1(2)Room No.442, 4[)2]Floor,BMTC Building,80 Feet Road, KoramangalaBangalore — 560 095.(International Taxation) Circie-1(2)Room No.442, 4[)2]Floor,BMTC Building,80 Feet Road, KoramangalaBangalore — 560 095.
2D The Commissioner of Income Tax-
International Taxation|
BMTC Complex,
80 Feet Road, Koramangala,|Bangalore — 560 095.Bangalore — 560 095.
... Respondents
These Writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 of the.Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated11.04.2017 at Annexure-X passed by R-1 rejecting thepetitioner’s application for extension of the stay of the balance
demands pursuant to the orders under Section 201 of the Actfor the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-2016 and etc.
These petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing this.day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed amemo for withdrawal of the writ petitions.
2. Tne memo snal!i be taken on record.3.|Therefore,tnewritpetitions|are|nereby|
dismissed as withdrawn.|
tsn*
od/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue