Case LawHigh Court › Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant V...

Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant Villa Tenants Association v. The Income Tax Department And 5 Ors

High Court 12 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant Villa Tenants Association v. The Income Tax Department And 5 Ors
Date of order
12 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant Villa Tenants Association v. The Income Tax Department And 5 Ors, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane * 1/2 * WP-1720-2018 (SR.3) Thursday, 12.7.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1720 OF 2018 Vinod Mahal and JayantVilla Tenants Association….Petitioner V/s. The Income-Tax Departmentand 5 Ors.….Respondents * * * * * Mr. Surel Shah i/by. Mr. Prashant Darandale, Advocate forthe petitioner. Ms. Swapna Gokhale, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-12TH JULY, 2018. P.C. :- 1.This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the tenants of thebuilding which is under attachment of the respondent- Rane * 2/2 * WP-1720-2018 (SR.3)Thursday, 12.7.2018 Income Tax Department. 2.Mr. Surel Shah, Learned Counsel appearing in support of the petition, on instructions, limits his prayer in this petition only to seek a direction that therepresentation dated 10th January, 2017 made by thepetitioners to the Commissioner of Income-Tax-21 bedisposed of by him in accordance with law. 3. Ms. Gokhale, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, on instructions, states that therepresentation dated 10[th] January, 2017 would be dulyconsidered and disposed of in accordance with law. 4.In view of the above statement made on behalf of the respondent-Revenue, Mr. Shah, Learned Counsel forthe petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. 5.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan