Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant Villa Tenants Association v. The Income Tax Department And 5 Ors
High Court
12 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant Villa Tenants Association v. The Income Tax Department And 5 Ors
Date of order
12 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/1720/2018 Of Vinod Mahal And Jayant Villa Tenants Association v. The Income Tax Department And 5 Ors, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
* 1/2 * WP-1720-2018 (SR.3)
Thursday, 12.7.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1720 OF 2018
Vinod Mahal and JayantVilla Tenants Association….Petitioner
V/s.
The Income-Tax Departmentand 5 Ors.….Respondents
* * * * *
Mr. Surel Shah i/by. Mr. Prashant Darandale, Advocate forthe petitioner.
Ms. Swapna Gokhale, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-12TH JULY, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.This petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India has been filed by the tenants of thebuilding which is under attachment of the respondent-
Rane
* 2/2 * WP-1720-2018 (SR.3)Thursday, 12.7.2018
Income Tax Department.
2.Mr. Surel Shah, Learned Counsel appearing in
support of the petition, on instructions, limits his prayer
in this petition only to seek a direction that therepresentation dated 10th January, 2017 made by thepetitioners to the Commissioner of Income-Tax-21 bedisposed of by him in accordance with law.
3.
Ms. Gokhale, Learned Counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondent, on instructions, states that therepresentation dated 10[th] January, 2017 would be dulyconsidered and disposed of in accordance with law.
4.In view of the above statement made on behalf
of the respondent-Revenue, Mr. Shah, Learned Counsel forthe petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.
5.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.