Wp/17308/2024 Of Nootigattu Satya Ngarjuna v. Principle Director General Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/17308/2024 Of Nootigattu Satya Ngarjuna v. Principle Director General Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2022-23
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/17308/2024 Of Nootigattu Satya Ngarjuna v. Principle Director General Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: GNJ, &TCDS,JWP17308 2024 10.Accordingly the Writ Petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
V
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 17308 OF 2024
Between:
Nootigattu Satya Ngarjuna, S/o. Nootigattu SasiKala Aged 30 Years,R/o.D.No.3-1,MainRoad,Nagasingabilli Post,Yalamanchili ,AnakapallyDistrict,A. P.
AND
...Petitioner
1.Principle Director General of Income Tax, for the State of AndhraPradesh and Telangana Region, Head Quarters at Hyderabad.Pradesh and Telangana Region, Head Quarters at Hyderabad.
2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (PCIT), Aayakaar Bhavan DabaGardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.
3. Assistant commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakaar Bhavan, DabaGardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.
4. Assessing Officer (A.O) of Income Tax, Aayakaar Bhavan, DabaGardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P-530020.Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P-530020.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue Writ, order or direction, more particularly one inthe
V
natureofwritof mandamusor any other appropriatedirectiontotherespondents in not allowing the Petitioner/Assessee to[ file] his Returns forthe Assessment Year 2022- 23 is illegal, arbitrary[and][ unconstitutional][ and]it amounts to violation of articles 14, 21 and 300(A)[of][ the][ Constitution][ of]India.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying thatin the[circumstances]stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respondents No.1 & 2 to set aside order of rejectingthedelaycondoneapplicationbytheRespondent-2(PCIT),Visakhapatnam and allow the applicationof thepetitionerfor condonedelay in filing returns for the assessment year 2022-23.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. ARAVAPALLI RATNA ADARSH
Counsel for the Respondents: ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI SC FORINCOME TAX
The Court made the following order:
APHC010338342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3507]
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION No. 17308/2024
Between:
Nootigattu Satya Ngarjuna...PETITIONER
AND
Principle Director General Of Income Tax
and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ARAVAPALLI RATNAADARSH
Counsel for the Respondents):
1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
2..
The Court made the following:
r
C
f
ORDER:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.C.D.Sekhar)
1. The present Writ Petitionisfiled against the orderdt.06.09.2023 passed by the Principal Commissioner[of][ Income]Tax (PCIT), Aayakaar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam.Itis the case of the petitioner that heis an assessee[with][ Pan]N0.ANQPNIOO8G.It is the further case of the petitioner[that][ he]could not file the returns for the assessment year[2022-2023,][ as]he was out of the country from 10.10.2021to 17.09.2022.[He]would further contend that he was staying in Canada[and][ after]coming to India, he met with an accident and sustained[injuries]dueto afall on the road,while he was going by bikeon21.11.2022.
2. The petitioner further stated in the affidavit that[his][ father]died during the covid period and thereafter he suffered[post][ covid]complications.It is his further case that, his mother[being][ a]lonely women is staying with his insane younger brother.In viewof the above facts he was in depression and could not[file][ returns]in time for the said period.
3. In view of the reasons stated above, the petitioner[has]filed Income Tax returns with a delay of ten (10) days[along][ with]
GNJ, &TCDS,JXWP_17308_2024WP_17308_2024
2. The petitioner further stated in the affidavit that[his][ father]died during the covid period and thereafter he suffered[post][ covid]complications.It is his further case that, his mother[being][ a]lonely women is staying with his insane younger brother.In viewof the above facts he was in depression and could not[file][ returns]in time for the said period.
3. In view of the reasons stated above, the petitioner[has]filed Income Tax returns with a delay of ten (10) days[along][ with]
GNJ, &TCDS,JXWP_17308_2024WP_17308_2024
an application under section 119(2)(b) of the Income TaxAct,1961. He further stated that, along with the said application hehas also filed medical prescription, the death certificateofhisfather and the passport showing that he was out of the country.
4. The 2""' respondent by impugned order dt.06.09.2023,rejected the application filed by the petitioner seeking to condonethe delay of ten (10) days in filing the returns on the ground that,the assessee has sufficient time tofile thereturns withintheprescribed time limit, the same was not filed and therefore cannottake advantage of the medical reports in as much as he was outof country from 10.10.2021 to 21.08.2022. but not til 17.11.2022as contended by him. Being aggrieved by the said order,thepetitioner preferred the instant writ petition.
5.On perusal of the record,it is succinctly clear thatthereis a delay of ten (10) days in filing the returnsfortheassessment year 2022-2023 by the petitioner.It is also clear fromthe record that the petitioner used to file the returnsin time forearlier periods from the year 2019 to 2022 regularly. The returnsfiled by him for the period 2019 to 2022are appended along withthe instant writ petition.thereis a delay of ten (10) days in filing the returnsfortheassessment year 2022-2023 by the petitioner.It is also clear fromthe record that the petitioner used to file the returnsin time forearlier periods from the year 2019 to 2022 regularly. The returnsfiled by him for the period 2019 to 2022are appended along withthe instant writ petition.
6. The 2"*^ respondent, while rejecting the application[of][ the]petitioner did not consider the documents filed by the petitioner[in]its proper perspective. Further, no prejudice would[be][ caused][ to]the department,if the same is allowed by directing the petitionerto file returns with delay in as much as the petitioner has to paythe applicable interest, as per the provisions of the[Act.]
7. As already stated in the instant case, the petitioner[has]filedthedeathcertificateofhisfatherandthecertificatedt.21.12.2022 issued by Sri Satya Sai Clinic, Visakhapatnamtoshow that he met with an accident on the said date.
8.In viewof the above,the respondent shouldhaveallowed the application filed by the petitioner and[to][ receive][ the]returns filed thereof, as such no prejudice would be[caused][ to][ it.]allowed the application filed by the petitioner and[to][ receive][ the]returns filed thereof, as such no prejudice would be[caused][ to][ it.]
9.Inthat view of thematter,the order dt.06.09.2023passed by the 2^^ respondent is set aside and the department[is]directedto receive the returnsfiledby thepetitionerfortheassessment year 2022-2023 and to process the same as[per][ law.]It is needless to mention that the petitioner is directed to pay theapplicableinterest along with the returns for this[assessment]period 2022-2023.
GNJ, &TCDS,JWP17308 2024
10.Accordingly the Writ Petition is allowed. There shall beno order as to costs.
11. As a sequel, pending applications,if any, shall[stand]
To,
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- U.SRl DEVIASSISTANT REGISTRAR/^SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principle Director General of Income Tax, for the State of AndhraPradesh and Telangana Region, Head Quarters at Hyderabad.Pradesh and Telangana Region, Head Quarters at Hyderabad.
2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (PCIT), Aayakaar BhavanDaba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.
GNJ, &TCDS,JWP17308 2024
10.Accordingly the Writ Petition is allowed. There shall beno order as to costs.
11. As a sequel, pending applications,if any, shall[stand]
To,
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- U.SRl DEVIASSISTANT REGISTRAR/^SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principle Director General of Income Tax, for the State of AndhraPradesh and Telangana Region, Head Quarters at Hyderabad.Pradesh and Telangana Region, Head Quarters at Hyderabad.
2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (PCIT), Aayakaar BhavanDaba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.
3. The Assistant commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakaar Bhavan, DabaGardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P- 530020.
4. The Assessing Officer (A.O) of Income Tax, Aayakaar Bhavan, DabaGardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P-530020.Gardens, Visakhapatnam, A.P-530020.
5. One CC toSri. Aravapalli Ratna Adarsh Advocate
6. One CC to Sri. Anup Koushik Karavadi SC for Income Tax
7. Three CD Copies
GSC
HIGH COURTDATED: 15/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.17308 of 2024
ALLOWING OF THE WPWITHOUT COSTS
:<OP*^ A1g3 0 DEC 2C2'i,^Current SeciltrnPSSPATC^^S
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.