Case Law › High Court › Wp/17318/2006 Of Dr.s.v.krishna Reddy v....

Wp/17318/2006 Of Dr.s.v.krishna Reddy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Guntur

High Court 20 Sep 2006 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

20 Sep 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/17318/2006 Of Dr.s.v.krishna Reddy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Guntur, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO W.P. NO. 17318 of 2006 Dated:20-09-2006 Between:- Dr. S.V. Krishna Reddy, s/o late S. Raghu Rami Reddy, aged 44years, R/o. 6II/41A, Pogathota, Nellore, Nellore District .PETITIONER And 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur, 2. The Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Hyderabad, 3. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-I, A.P. Ayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, HyderabadBasheerbagh, Hyderabad 4. The Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. … RESPONDENTS. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO W.P. NO. 17318 of 2006 O R D E R(per Hon’ble Sri Justice J. Chelameswar) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of thedevelopments subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, thegrievance of the petitioner has been alleviated by the respondents andhence the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. Nocosts. ____________________ CHELAMESWAR, J J. _______________ RAO, J20[th] September, 2006vp D. APPA

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.