Case LawHigh Court › Wp/17323/2021 Of M/S. Singapore Telecomm...

Wp/17323/2021 Of M/S. Singapore Telecommunications Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 23 Nov 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/17323/2021 Of M/S. Singapore Telecommunications Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2017-18, 2010-11
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/17323/2021 Of M/S. Singapore Telecommunications Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The submissions remain undisputed, and therefore the petition is allowed quashing the notice impugned and the impugned proceeding in this petition.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byNARASIMHAMURTHYVANAMALALocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD -WRIT PETITION NO. 17323 OF 2021 (TIT)BETWEEN: M/S. SINGAPORE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED SINGAPORE 31 EXETER ROAD, COMCENTRE SINGAPORE -239732 SINGAPORE REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR KOH BOON CHYE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARPEET SINGH AJMANI AND SRI. YOGESHA B., ADVOCATES) AND: 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE -2 (2) ROOM NO.R30 4TH FLOOR BMTC BUILDING 80 FT ROAD 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560095 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE -2 (2) ROOM NO.R30 4TH FLOOR BMTC BUILDING 80 FT ROAD 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560095 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION RANGE-2 ROOM NO.741 7TH FLOOR BMTC BUILDING 80 FT ROAD 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560095 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION RANGE-2 ROOM NO.741 7TH FLOOR BMTC BUILDING 80 FT ROAD 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560095 3.VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED 10TH FLOOR BIRLA CENTURION 10TH FLOOR BIRLA CENTURION CENTURION MILLS COMPOUND PANDURANG BUDKKAR MARG WORLI MUMBAI-400030 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS 4.THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NORTH BLOCK CENTRAL SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI-110001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DILIP M., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 AND R4; NOTICE TO R3 IS D/W) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DTD.31.3.2021 IMPUGNED NOTICE MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER INITIATING REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR AY 2017-18; QUASH THE ORDER DTD.12.7.2021 (MARKED AS ANNEXURE-K) PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER DISPOSING OFF OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE PETITIONER THEREBY CONFIRMING CONTINUATION OF REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR AY 2017-18. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the question for consideration would be the taxability of the amounts received by petitioner over a period of years. This question insofar as the assessment year 2010-11 was pending consideration before this Court in W.P.No.51999/2019 and W.P.No.53137/2008, and these writ petitions are disposed of holding that such question is no longer res integra in view of the decision of a Division Bench in ITA No.160/2015 and connected matters. The submissions remain undisputed, and therefore the petition is allowed quashing the notice impugned and the impugned proceeding in this petition. SD/- JUDGE RB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan