Case Law › High Court › Wp/17471/2009 Of M/S. Syndicate Realtors...

Wp/17471/2009 Of M/S. Syndicate Realtors v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 02 Sep 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

02 Sep 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp/17471/2009 Of M/S. Syndicate Realtors v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION Nos. 17471 OF 2009 Dated: 02-09-2009 Between: M/s Syndicate Realtors,Ameerpet, Hyderabad and another …Petitioners and The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad and others …Respondents. ORDER: (Per GR, J) The petitioners are aggrieved that the 1[st] respondent-Tribunal hasnot yet disposed of the application filed on 8-4-2009 seeking ad-interim stay in Appeal Nos. 186 to 188/H/09 inrespect of the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that thelearned Tribunal has listed hearing of the application for interim relief, on7-9-2009. In the circumstances, the grievance does not subsist. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 2[nd ]September, 2009.GRRGRR __________________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.