Wp/1777/1996 Of Suraj Prasad v. The Tax Revery Officer Under The Income Tax Act (V)
High Court
01 Feb 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/1777/1996 Of Suraj Prasad v. The Tax Revery Officer Under The Income Tax Act (V)
Date of order
01 Feb 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/1777/1996 Of Suraj Prasad v. The Tax Revery Officer Under The Income Tax Act (V), the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1777 of 1996
Between:
Suraj Prasad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Tax Recovery Officer
Under the Income Tax Act (V),III Floor, Ayakar Bhavan,
Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki,)
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that subjectmatter of the writ petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous. No costs.
(Bilal Nazki, J)
1[st] February, 2006
---------------------------
(D.Appa Rao, J)
LUR
---------------------------
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue