Wp/179/2005 Of Kirti Stationers P. Ltd v. R. Andiappan. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Central Circle-33
High Court
02 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/179/2005 Of Kirti Stationers P. Ltd v. R. Andiappan. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Central Circle-33
Date of order
02 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/179/2005 Of Kirti Stationers P. Ltd v. R. Andiappan. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Central Circle-33, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byPURTI1/2PURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2021.12.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY18:19:58+0530ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 179 OF 2005
Kirti Stationers Private Limited
V/s.R. Andiappan Asst. Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central Circle 33 and Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. P.J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Mr. Atul K.Jasani for Petitioner.None for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 2[nd] DECEMBER, 2021
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
P.C. :
1.Mr. Pardiwalla states that facts and all material particulars inthis petition are identical to the facts in Writ Petition No. 178 of 2005except the amounts and names of the unit and petitioner varies.
2.We accept the statement of learned senior counsel and makethese petitions also absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) therein which
reads as under :-
(a) that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ ofCertiorari or a Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any otherappropriate Writ, Order or Direction under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, calling for the records of the Petitioner’scase in so far as they relate to the impugned notice dated 30[th]March 2004 being Exhibit “F” hereto, the impugned allegedapproval of Respondent No.2 under Section 151 of the Act, theimpugned order dated 27[th] December, 2004 being Exhibit “L”hereto and the impugned reassessment proceedings of thePetitioner for the Assessment Year 1997-98 and after going
through the same and examining the question of the legalitythereof, to quash and cancel the same.
3.Petitions disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.