Case LawHigh Court › Wp/18166/2006 Of Smt. T.n. Pushpavenamma...

Wp/18166/2006 Of Smt. T.n. Pushpavenamma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/18166/2006 Of Smt. T.n. Pushpavenamma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/18166/2006 Of Smt. T.n. Pushpavenamma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A V RAVINDRA BABU WRIT PETITION NO: 18166 OF 2006 Between: Smt. T.N. Pushpavenamma,, C/o. Sri T.N. Pavan Kumar Reddy, D.No.16-617,Gandhi Road, Madanapally. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirupathi Charge, Tirupathi. 2. Assistant Commissionerof Income TAx, Circle-1 (1), Aayakar BhavanK.T.road, Tirupathi.K.T.road, Tirupathi. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin theaffidavit filed therewith,theHigh Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order especiallyin the natureof writofcertiorari quashing the order No.CIT/Tech/264/3/05-06 dt. 23.11.2005 passed bythe first respondent. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006fWPMP. NO: 22806 OF 2006^ PetitionunderSection151CPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the order No. CIT/Tech/264/3/05-06 dt. 23.11.2005 passedby the first respondent. Counsel for the PetitioneriSRI. S. RAVI Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2: SRI. A. RADHA KRISHNA(SC INCOMETAX) The Court made the following: ORDER *'■/ / ./ / To, THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU WRIT PETITION No. 18166 OF 2006 JUDGMENT;- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilkari) On 20.10.2023, the following order was passed:- “No representation for the petitioner. List the matter on 02.11.2023.” 2.The matter is in the weekly cause list. 3.Todayalso,thereisnorepresentationforthe petitioner. 4.TheWritPetitionisdismissedforwantof prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending. shall also stand closed. SD/- K. KASI RAO ACHARIASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (^^ECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to SRI. S. RAVI Advocate 2. One CC to SRI. A. RADHA KRISHNA(SC FOR INCOMETAX ) Advocate 3.Three C D.Copiesnm HIGH COURT DATED:01/12/2023 ORDERWP.No.18166 of 2006 /^r?>u 3■p'lTcAiC!.«.»‘vJ>T/f.r'C,tjkeo5copt(^S>(/^l<5i/ DISMISING THE WP FOR WANT FORPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS A
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan