In Wp/18271/2006 Of Mrs. Nishi Devi v. Union Of India, Department Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.18271 of 2006
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Rakesh Kumar)
Today again none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Due to repeated none appearance on behalf of the petitioner on earlier occasion, it was directed to list the writ petition under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the fact that the writ petition has been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, again there is none appearance on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the cause in the writ petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
___________________________
JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue