Case LawHigh Court › Wp/18381/2010 Of Gomatesh Vidyapeeta v....

Wp/18381/2010 Of Gomatesh Vidyapeeta v. Deputy (Asst) Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 05 Feb 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/18381/2010 Of Gomatesh Vidyapeeta v. Deputy (Asst) Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/18381/2010 Of Gomatesh Vidyapeeta v. Deputy (Asst) Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE S DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION Nos.18381 OF 2010%%AND 3095060 OF 2010 |[TIT| BETWEEN GOMATESH VIDYAPEETAA REGISTERED TRUST REGISTERED UNDER THEPROVISION OF BOMBAY PUBLIC TRUST ACT,HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HINWADI, BELGAUM,REP BY ITS ADHISTATHA, SRI SANJAY B. PATIL, ... PETITIONER (BY SRI M.L. WANTI & SRI V.S. KOUJALAGI, ADVS.) AND 1.DEPUTY (ASST) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-2, FEROZE KHIMJIBHAICOMMERCIAL COMPLEX,OPP DISTRICT HOSPITAL,DR BR AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM.CIRCLE-2, FEROZE KHIMJIBHAICOMMERCIAL COMPLEX,OPP DISTRICT HOSPITAL,DR BR AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM. 2.VICE CHAIRMANSETTLEMENT COMMISSIONSETTLEMENT COMMISSION MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOI,ADDITIONAL BENCH, 640,ADDITIONAL BENCH, 640, AWNNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600035. 3.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXADMINISTRATION,FEROZE KHIMJIBHAI, COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP DIST HOSPITALDRBR AMBEDKAR ROAD!BELGUAM.ADMINISTRATION,FEROZE KHIMJIBHAI, COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP DIST HOSPITALDRBR AMBEDKAR ROAD!BELGUAM. 4.TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE-1FEROZE KHIMJIBHAI, COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP DIST HOSPITALDRBR AMBEDKAR ROAD!BELGUAM.FEROZE KHIMJIBHAI, COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP DIST HOSPITALDRBR AMBEDKAR ROAD!BELGUAM. .. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV. FOR R1-R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 & 22/7 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIPRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DT.27.5.08 &6.7.09, ON THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILEDBY THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT PASSED BY THER2, ETC. THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FORPRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B’ GROUP, THIS DAY,THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - ORDER Memo for withdrawal filed by the learnedadvocate for tne petitioners is placed on recordand tne writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. �7=258>�7!�52!25@2:�8 �892�B28787 ?25!�8 �!22C5232:>�=24 52�A 3B282?8�� D58��74�! �;:@7!2:� �<<�A ?82?87 ?!�5;7!2:�7?�892!2�B28787 ?!�;52 <248� B2?� !;AF ��E%�����
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan