Case LawHigh Court › Wp/18439/2004 Of M/S Mahavir Enterprises...

Wp/18439/2004 Of M/S Mahavir Enterprises (India) Pvt.limited v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 14 Oct 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/18439/2004 Of M/S Mahavir Enterprises (India) Pvt.limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/18439/2004 Of M/S Mahavir Enterprises (India) Pvt.limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18439 of 2004 Between: M/s Mahavir Enterprises (India) Pvt.Limited, "DHAROD HOUSE', 4-1-896/A, Bogulakunta, Hyderabadrep.by its Director Mukesh K.Dharod, S/o Late Kunverji V Dharod, aged about 46 years,Resident of Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(4), Posnet Bhavan, Tilak Road, Hyderabad 2.HDFC Bank, Himayatnagar Branch, Hyderabad, rep.by its Manager .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue aWrit, direction or order especially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring theattachment of the Petitioner's cash, credit-cum-overdraft account with the secondrespondent purportedly under Section 226(3) of the Act, for recovering of dues of thecreditors of the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and setaside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.RAVI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.J.V.PRASAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18439 of 2004 ORDER:(PER Sri Bilal Nazki, J) Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw thewrit petition. Permission is accorded. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ------------------------ (BILAL NAZKI, J) 14[th] October, 2004 ----------------------(S.ANANDA REDDY, J) Copy to: 1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(4), Posnet Bhavan, Tilak Road, Hyderabad 2.The Manager, HDFC Bank, Himayatnagar Branch, Hyderabad, 3.Two CD copies.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan