Case LawHigh Court › Wp/18477/2004 Of All India Crime Prevent...

Wp/18477/2004 Of All India Crime Prevention League v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax I And Ii

High Court 08 Nov 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/18477/2004 Of All India Crime Prevention League v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax I And Ii
Date of order
08 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/18477/2004 Of All India Crime Prevention League v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax I And Ii, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18477 of 2004 Between: All India Crime Prevention League, Rep.by its Executive Member Mr.P.JohnMark, S/o P.Chinna Venkataiah, R/o 16-8-908/7, Yadav Complex, Malakpet X Roads, Hyderabad - 500 024 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax I & II, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,HyderabadHyderabad 2 The Director (Investigation), Income Tax Office, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,HyderabadHyderabad 3 The Vigilance Officer, Income Tax Dept., Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,HyderabadHyderabad 4 The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Koti, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an order, direction or a Writ more particularly in the nature of Writ ofMandamus by declaring the inaction of the respondent authorities on the representations and telegrams submitted by the petitioner society complainingevasion of tax by the several persons and also collusion of the officers concerned inthe Income Tax areas of Proddatur, Nandyal, Kadapa, Hyderabad which is not onlyarbitrary but also contrary to the public interest and loss of revenue to theGovernment and consequently direct the R-1 and R-4 to pass appropriate orders onthe representations submitted on 5-4-2004 and on 29-12-2003 by making a detailedprobe and also by taking the cooperation of the petitioner society into the taxevasion amounting to lakhs of rupees, and to submit action taken report (ATR) to thisHon'ble Court within the stipulated time. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KRISHNA DEVAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: MR.S.R.ASHOK The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following: This matter has been adjourned on six occasions. No cause of action is disclosed.The petitioner wants to proceed against number of people, who have not been madeas parties, neither their particulars have been given. Today also an adjournment issought. Declined. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________________ BILAL NAZKI, J ________________________ S. ANANDA REDDY, JDt. 08-11-2004Pvks/* To 1 The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax I & II, Ayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, HyderabadBasheerbagh, Hyderabad 2 The Director (Investigation), Income Tax Office, Ayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, HyderabadBasheerbagh, Hyderabad 3 The Vigilance Officer, Income Tax Dept., Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,HyderabadHyderabad 4 The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Koti, Hyderabad 5.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSR}
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan