Wp/18509/2022 Of Vijaya Lakshmi Narla v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
09 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/18509/2022 Of Vijaya Lakshmi Narla v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/18509/2022 Of Vijaya Lakshmi Narla v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETryWRIT PETITION NO: 1 8509 0F 2022
Between:
Vijaya Lakshmi Narra, Dfo.^V. sundara Ramaiah, Age-52 years occ. Business,H. No. 3-220 to 222tppt202, pragati pride, iha;e il, kavuri fflffr, lrniLuHil ls, Hyderabad-500033.H. No. 3-220 to 222tppt202, pragati pride, iha;e il, kavuri fflffr, lrniLuHil ls, Hyderabad-500033.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 6 (1), I T Tower. ACGuards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-500004.Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-500004.
2. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, Dep?rtment of Revenue, Ministry of
Finance, Govt. of lndia, Secretariat Buildings, New Delhi - 1 10001 .
Represented by its Chairman.
3. The union of lndia, Ministry of Finance, centrar secretariat, North Brock, NewDelhi-l 10001 . Represented by its Secretary.Delhi-l 10001 . Represented by its Secretary.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus, by declaring the impugned notice issued by the 1strespondent vide Document ldentification No.(DlN) tTBAiAST/S/i 4 Bl2o21-2211032702767(1)dt. 2810412021, without following the due procedure of Law thattoo by taking shelter under the explanations inserted in GBDT notification nos.2ol2o21 dt.3110312021 and 3812021 dt.27to4l2o21, as, void, illegal and contraryto the provisions of lncome-tax Act and ultra vires the constitution of lndia
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing notice u/s 148 of theAct vide Document ldentification No.(DlN) ITBA/AST/S/14812021-the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing notice u/s 148 of theAct vide Document ldentification No.(DlN) ITBA/AST/S/14812021-2211032702767(1) dt. 2810412021 , and may pass such other orders as theHon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interests of substantial justice, asothenrvise the Petitioner would be put to irreparable loss and severe injury.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. DUNDU MANMOHAN
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: SRl. J.V. PRASAD SENIOR SC FOR
INCOME TAX
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR ,
,DY.SOLICITOR GEN OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HOPBLE [P.SAM KOSHY]
AND
THE IIOITBLE [I.A:'IMI ]
w.P. No. 185O9of
JUDGMENT:[(per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P.SAM ][KOSHY)]
HeardSriDunduManmohan,IearnedcounselforthepetitionerarrdSri J.V. [Prasad, ][Iearned Senior Standing ][Counsel ][for ][Income ][Tax]Department
2.Whenthematteristakenupforhearing,learnedcounselfortheDepartment [has ][produced before ][this ][Court ][a ][copy ][of ][Note ][issued]by Jt.ClT [(OSD), ][ITJI, uide ][F'No'279/Misc ]['/M-5112O22-\TJ ][']dated 13.02.2023, [wherein, ][it ][is ][stated ][that ][the ][department ][has ][taken ][a]decision [to drop ][the.proceedings ][against the ][petitioner ][and ][the ][proceedings]initiated thus [got disPosed ][of']
3. In the light [of ][the ][developments ][that ][have ][been ][transpired' this ][Court]is o[ the [view ][t]rat no ][further ][cause ][of ][action ][survives ][and ][no ][further]orders need [to ][be passed ][in ][this ][writ petition']
4Accordingly, [the ][Writ ][Petition stands ][closed' ][No ][order ][as ][to ][costs]
2.Whenthematteristakenupforhearing,learnedcounselfortheDepartment [has ][produced before ][this ][Court ][a ][copy ][of ][Note ][issued]by Jt.ClT [(OSD), ][ITJI, uide ][F'No'279/Misc ]['/M-5112O22-\TJ ][']dated 13.02.2023, [wherein, ][it ][is ][stated ][that ][the ][department ][has ][taken ][a]decision [to drop ][the.proceedings ][against the ][petitioner ][and ][the ][proceedings]initiated thus [got disPosed ][of']
3. In the light [of ][the ][developments ][that ][have ][been ][transpired' this ][Court]is o[ the [view ][t]rat no ][further ][cause ][of ][action ][survives ][and ][no ][further]orders need [to ][be passed ][in ][this ][writ petition']
4Accordingly, [the ][Writ ][Petition stands ][closed' ][No ][order ][as ][to ][costs]
Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending' ][if ][any' shall ][sta-nd]
closed
SD/. G. SIREESHAASSISTANT //TRUE COPY//SECTIN OFFICER
To,1one CC to SRl. CC to SRl. 6d iI to SRl. [DUNDU MANMOHAN, Advocate 1one CC to SRl. CC to SRl. 6d iI to SRl. [DUNDU MANMOHAN, Advocate
215.# one CC to SRl. CC to SRl. 6d iI to SRl. [[s-ni. ]]SRl. [Lv ][pnasAb,'sENioR ][sTANDING ][couNSEL ][FoR]INCOME [ ] [ ]INCOME [ ] [ ]
[[s-ni. ]]INCOME [ ] 2one CC to SRl. ' [DY' SOLICITOR ][ ] toPUCltoPUCl
4Two CD CoPiesBMGJP *rVBMGJP *rV
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910812023
ORDER
WP.No.18509 of 2022
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS
(,\[\-$]
61[r.'$E][ ,oF]oisd\t1?l)\tIcollI0t.gP6
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.