Case Law › High Court › Wp/18675/2003 Of Swaraj Kumar Mohanty v....

Wp/18675/2003 Of Swaraj Kumar Mohanty v. The Income-Tax Settlement Commission

High Court 29 Dec 2011 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

29 Dec 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/18675/2003 Of Swaraj Kumar Mohanty v. The Income-Tax Settlement Commission, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: This writ petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.18675 OF 2003 Dt: 29-12-2011. Between: SWARAJ KUMAR MOHANTY .. PETITIONER AND THE INCOME TAX SETTLEMENTCOMMISSION,MINISTRY OF FINANCE,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,ADDITIONAL BENCH,ANNA SALAI,CHENNAIAND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.18675 OF 2003 ORDER: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur) In view of the order dated 18-04-2011, matter stands automaticallydismissed. No further orders are required to be passed in the writpetition. This writ petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petition is alsodismissed. Dt: 29-12-2011. ( MADAN B.LOKUR, CJ ) ( SANJAY KUMAR, J ) TNB HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.18675 OF 2003 ORDER: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur) DT: 29.12.2011.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.