Wp/18696/2003 Of Swaraj Kumar Mohanty v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission
High Court
02 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/18696/2003 Of Swaraj Kumar Mohanty v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission
Date of order
02 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/18696/2003 Of Swaraj Kumar Mohanty v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Writ Petition No.18696 of 2003
ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
This writ petition is filed by the Revenue feeling aggrieved bythe order, dated 29.04.2002 passed by the Income Tax SettlementCommission, the 1[st] respondent herein, on an application submittedby the 2[nd] respondent.
Though several grounds are urged in the writ petition, we arenot inclined to deal with the matter on merits. The reason is thatlearned counsel for the 2[nd] respondent has placed before us a copyof the order, dated 01.11.2002, passed by the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in S.L.P.Nos.8301-8312 of 2002, filed against the very order,dated 29.04.2002, passed by the 1[st] respondent. Their Lordshipsdismissed the S.L.Ps. No observation whatever was made enablingthe Department to file a writ petition before us.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be noorder as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in this writ petition shall alsostand disposed of.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
Date:02.12.2014GJ
_____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.