In Wp/1931/2022 Of Bhagyalaxmi Fashion Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-4(1)(1) And 4 Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPURTIPRASAD ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPARABDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2023.08.2111:40:36 +0530WRIT PETITION NO. 1931 OF 2022
Bhagyalaxmi Fashion Limited….Petitioner V/s.Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Circle 4(1)(1), Mumbai and Ors.…Respondents
…Respondents
----
Mr. Ajay Singh i/b Mr. Sameer Dalal for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED : 18[th] AUGUST 2023
P.C. :
1.
Mr. Singh seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to
raise all contentions before the Assessing Officer.
2.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.