Case Law › High Court › Wp/19642/2005 Of Icfain Transworld Unive...

Wp/19642/2005 Of Icfain Transworld University Counsil v. The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)

High Court 12 Sep 2005 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

12 Sep 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/19642/2005 Of Icfain Transworld University Counsil v. The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn withliberty as sought for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SUDERSHAN REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 19642 of 2005 Dated 14[th] September, 2005 Between: ICFAIN Transworld University Council, Plot No.52, Nagarjuna Hills, Hyderabad. And -- Petitioner. The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and others. Respondents. ORAL ORDER: (per Honourable Sri Justice B.Sudershan Reddy) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw the writpetition with liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to him in law. Leaveis accordingly granted. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn withliberty as sought for. No costs. _____________________ B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, J. 14.9.2005. __________________ S.ANANDA REDDY, J. VR

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.