Wp/1985/2022 Of Vinayak Singh v. Income Tax Officer Ward 34 (3)(7) And 2 Ors
High Court
06 Sep 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1985/2022 Of Vinayak Singh v. Income Tax Officer Ward 34 (3)(7) And 2 Ors
Date of order
06 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/1985/2022 Of Vinayak Singh v. Income Tax Officer Ward 34 (3)(7) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
PRIYARAJESHSOPARKAR
Digitally signed byPRIYA RAJESHSOPARKARDate: 2022.09.0617:36:44 +0530
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1985 OF 2022
Vinayak Singh… PetitionerV/s.Income Tax Officer,Ward 34(3)(7), Mumbai and ors.… Respondents
… Respondents
---
Mr.Bhupinderjit Singh alongwith Mr.Akshay Naik i/by Mr.Vishal Hegde,Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondents.
---
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 06, 2022.
P.C.:-
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition
with liberty to avail an appropriate alternate remedy.
2.Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue