Case Law › High Court › Wp/2000/2019 Of Tariq Carrimjee v. Assis...

Wp/2000/2019 Of Tariq Carrimjee v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax International Tax, Circle 4(2)(2) And 2 Ors

High Court 14 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Sep 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/2000/2019 Of Tariq Carrimjee v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax International Tax, Circle 4(2)(2) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed1/1by GAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2021.09.15by GAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2021.09.1510:31:38 +0530IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2000 OF 2019 Tariq Carrimjee V/s. ….Petitioner Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxInternational Tax, Circle 4 (2) (2) & Ors. ….Respondents ---- Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b. Mr. Balasaheb Yewale for petitioner.Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal for respondent nos.1 and 2. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ DATED : 14[th] SEPTEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1Mr. Agrawal seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 2Petition dismissed as withdrawn. 3We find that on 5[th] December 2019 an ad-interim stay was granted. That stay stands vacated. (R.I. CHAGLA J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.