In Wp v. Secy Income Tax Dept Union Of India New Delhi And 2 Others, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYWrit Petition No.2004 of 2016
ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri D.V.Ramana Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, seekspermission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also standdismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date: 15.02.2016JSU
___________________________________
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
JSU
Writ Petition No.2004 of 2016
Date:15.02.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue