Wp/200544/2019 Of Pralhadrao And Anr v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
High Court
09 Jan 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhckalaburagi
Parties
Wp/200544/2019 Of Pralhadrao And Anr v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
09 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/200544/2019 Of Pralhadrao And Anr v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is|dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAKALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
$WRIT PETITION No.200544/2019 (GMCPC)
Between
1,Pralhadrao»/o Ramrao DeshpandeAge: /O years, Occ: Pvt. ServiceR/o Station RoadShikarkhana CrossVijaypura-986 101
?)Rajesh
»/o Shankar Rao MujumdarAge: 90 years, Occ: ServiceR/o Station RoadShikarkhana RoadVijayapur-9386 10
... Petitioners
(By Sri Uday P. Honguntikar, Advocate-Absent)
And
1.The Additional Commissionerof Income Tax, Bijapur RangeOpp. Civil HospitalBelgaum-590 OO1of Income Tax, Bijapur RangeOpp. Civil HospitalBelgaum-590 OO1
?)The Union oft IndiRepresented by the SecretaryGovt. ot India
New Delhi-110 OO1
... Respondents
(By Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocate for R1;R2-served but unrepresented)
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of theConstitution of India praying to set aside the order inMiscellaneousAppealNo.9/2014|passedby---%AdditionalSeniorCivilJudge,Vijayapur,dated12.10.2018 which is at Annexure-F.
This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in‘B’ Group, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER
It is submitted by the learned counsel torrespondent No.1 that the petition is directed against theinterim relief granted in the suit and now the suit itselfhas been disposed of and hence, the petition is renderedinfructuous.
2. There is no representation on behalf of thepetitioners. The submission of the learned counsel forrespondent No.1 is placed on record. The petition is|dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/-JUDGE
5/=
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue