Case LawHigh Court › Wp/20069/2019 Of The Joint Commissioner...

Wp/20069/2019 Of The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds) v. Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 09 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/20069/2019 Of The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds) v. Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
09 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/20069/2019 Of The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds) v. Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

[ [3386 ]] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETW WRIT PETITION NO: 20069 OF 2019 Between: The Joint Commissioner of lncome{ax (TDS), (formerly Addl. Commissionerof lncome-tax (TDS), TDS Range -2, 4th Floor, D-Block lT Towers, ACGuards, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND 1. lncome{ax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', CGO Officers Complex,Kavadiguda, Hyderabad.Kavadiguda, Hyderabad. 2. M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd, 6-3-570, Eenadu Complex, Somajiguda,Hyderabad.Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1"t respondentlncome-tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench B, Hyderabiid, dated 18-04-2019 in M.A.No.49&37lHydl2O1$ (arising out of lTA.Nos 546 & 5471 Hydl2o17)and to quash the same by holding the same as violative of the principles ofnatural [justice ]and violative of the provisions of Sec.254(2) of the lncome tax Act,1961.2019 in M.A.No.49&37lHydl2O1$ (arising out of lTA.Nos 546 & 5471 Hydl2o17)and to quash the same by holding the same as violative of the principles ofnatural [justice ]and violative of the provisions of Sec.254(2) of the lncome tax Act,1961. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the order of the lncome-tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench B,Hyderabad, dated 18-04-2019 in M.A.No.49 & 371 Hydl201B (arising out oflTA.Nos 546 & 547lHydl2017, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA KRISHNA REDDY FOR SRI A.RADHAKRISHNA, Sr SC For lT DEPTCounsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI C.V.NARASIMHAMCoun5el for the Respondent No.1 : -The Court made the following: JUDGMENT T] E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SE.M K(,SHY AND THE HON, II.,E SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANI\ ,TLISHETTYW.P. No. 20o69 of 2OL9 JUDGMENT:fu. :r Hon'ble Sri Jusrice P,SAM KOSHY) Ilearcl [! :. A. Rama Krishna Reddy re rrres,3 tt ng Mr. RadhaKrishn:r Recld,r learned Senior Standing Cour sel [<,r I'I Departmentappearing for 1 e pt:titioner prays frtr withclrawr . 2. As pra.re 1:r permission is accordcd 3. Accordil 1,,, -his Writ Petition is dismis;ecl as withdrau.n. NoCOSTS Consequt tt ly, miscollurneous petitions Jrend ir rg if uny, shallstand closed.stand closed. SD/- K.lS lE:ERAMA MURTHYASSIS'I'ANT REGISTRAR(i+:S;ECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY// To1. One CC to SR A.RADHA KRISHNA, Sr SC For lT DEPT fr.)PLlCl2. One CC to S;R C.V NARASIIVHAM, Advocate 3. Two CD CopiePSKGJP HIGH COUR'' DATED:09101 12023 JUDGMENT WP.No.20069 of 2019 ' .-r ['').]1:i,.!lt. DISMISSING ["HE ]WRIT PETITIONAS WITHDRA ruN WITHOUT COSTS. D-- [-r<]r(l]tp73t@)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan