Wp/20088/2023 Of Nidhi Atul Khare v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 Aug 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/20088/2023 Of Nidhi Atul Khare v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/20088/2023 Of Nidhi Atul Khare v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous with a cost ofRs.500/- saddled on the Revenue for giving a cause of action to the petitioner,which ought not have arisen in the first place thereby compelling the petitionerto initiate this avoidable piece of litigation and correspondingly w...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)ON THE 28[th] OF AUGUST, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 20088 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
NIDHI ATUL KHARE W/O SHRI ATUL KHARE, AGEDABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O 18,HOUSING BOARD COLONY, MANDLA (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI MANISH CHANDRA MISHRA - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-iAAYAKAR BHAWAN, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)AAYAKAR BHAWAN, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 (1) JABALPUR,ANNEXURE BUILDING AAYAKAR BHAWANNAPIER TOWN JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SIDDHARTH SHARMA - ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, Justice Sheel Nagu
passed the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner at the very outset submits that rectificationorder in favour of Assessee has been passed on 25/08/2023 and therefore, thecause raised herein has become infructuous. Learned counsel prays for cost ofthis petition.
Registry is directed to take the rectification order dated 25/08/2023 on
record.
Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous with a cost ofRs.500/- saddled on the Revenue for giving a cause of action to the petitioner,which ought not have arisen in the first place thereby compelling the petitionerto initiate this avoidable piece of litigation and correspondingly wasting theprecious time of this Court. The said cost be paid to the Assessee by creditingin her Bank account within 30 days, failing which the case will be taken up forcompliance as PUD qua cost.
(SHEEL NAGU)(AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI))JUDGEJUDGEas
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.