Wp/20143/2021 Of Karnataka Bank Limited v. Additional /Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax / Income Tax Officer

Digitallysigned byCHAITHANYAKLocation:High Court ofKarnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN -WRIT PETITION NO. 20143 OF 2021 (TIT) BETWEEN: 1. KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED, MAHAVEER CIRCLE, KANKANADY, KARNATAKA-575 002. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND CFO MR. MURALIDHAR KRISHNA RAO. MAHAVEER CIRCLE, KANKANADY, KARNATAKA-575 002. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND CFO MR. MURALIDHAR KRISHNA RAO. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. MANASA ANANTHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDITIONAL /JOINT/DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, ROOM NO.401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110 003. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, ROOM NO.401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110 003. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, ITO, MANGALORE- 575 001. CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, ITO, MANGALORE- 575 001. 3. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y.V., AND SRI. M.DILIP, ADVOCATES) - 2 - THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER DATED 16.09.2021 (ANNEXURE-N) BEARING DIN ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2021-22/1035646243(1) PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 U/S 143(3) R/W 144(B) OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 14.11.2024 with a prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach appellate authority in the manner known to law. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority in the manner known to law. If petitioner were to file an appeal, the Appellate Court shall condone the delay spent by the petitioner pursuing the writ petition. 4. Registry is directed to return back the certified/original copies of annexures produced along with the writ petition after obtaining photocopies of the same for record purpose. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46