Wp/201664/2016 Of Boda Suryanarayan v. Income Tax Recovery Officer And Anr
High Court
13 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhckalaburagi
Parties
Wp/201664/2016 Of Boda Suryanarayan v. Income Tax Recovery Officer And Anr
Date of order
13 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/201664/2016 Of Boda Suryanarayan v. Income Tax Recovery Officer And Anr, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby B NAGAVENILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNAT AKAKALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1L DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE.THE HON BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANL|$WRIT PETITION NO. 201664 OF 2016 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
BODA SURYANARAYANS/O BODA RAMAPPAAGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,R/AT NEAR BODA CIRCLESTATION ROAD, 4 WARD,PATEL NAGAR, HOSPET,BELLARY DISTRICT.
PETITIONER.
(BY SRI.VIVEK.A.R., AND
SRI.GANESH GHALI., ADVOCATES |ABSENT ]) |
AND:
1.|INCOME TAX RECOVERY OFFICER,AAYAKAR BHAVAN SEEDAM ROAD,OPPOSITE JAYANAGAR, GULBARGA —- 585 105.2.|K.KUMARS/O K.NAGARAG,AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,R/AT 21 WARD BELLARY ROAD,HOSPET —- 583 27/3. RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ., ADVOCATE FOR R11)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAINRELIEFS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,|THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on)behalf of the petitioner. |
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petitionwas listed on Q2.03.2023. On that day, there was no.representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition|was ordered to be listed on 13.03.7023.
Tne petition is listed today.
As already noted above, wnen the matter is called, today|also tnere is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.|Hence, the Writ Petition isadismissefor non-prosecution.|
TKN
List No.: 1 S| No.: 14.
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue