Wp/202562/2023 Of M/S Vishala Mahila Vividoddeshagala Sahakari Sangh Niyamit v. Income Tax Officer And Anr
High Court
12 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhckalaburagi
Parties
Wp/202562/2023 Of M/S Vishala Mahila Vividoddeshagala Sahakari Sangh Niyamit v. Income Tax Officer And Anr
Date of order
12 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/202562/2023 Of M/S Vishala Mahila Vividoddeshagala Sahakari Sangh Niyamit v. Income Tax Officer And Anr, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal under Section 148, Section 80P of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this writ petition, petitioner is seeking writ ofmandamus to the respondents to permit the petitioner to file return of income in response to notice issued underSection 148 of Income Tax Act, 1960. ‘3Having taken note of the averments made in|the|writpetition, In|identicalCAaASthis.CourtIn -3- W.P.No.201282/2022 dis...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitallysigned by BNAGAVENILocation:High CourtOfKarnataka
NC: 2023:KHC-K:/724WP No. 202562 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA |KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH|
;WRIT PETITION NO.202562 OF 2023 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S VISHALA MAHILA VIVIDODDESHAGALASAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMITT(A CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY —ESTABLISHED UNDER THEKARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVESOCIETIES ACT, 1959)PLOT NO.374, VENKATESH NAGAR,BASAVAN BAGEWADI,VIJAYAPUR-586109, |REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, |SMT. SAROJA KOULAPUR
PETITIONER
(BY SRI,GOPALKRISHNA B. YADAV, HCGP& SRI. ASHOK KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 & TPS.AAYAKAR BHAVAN,NEAR ALL INDIA RADIO |ATHANI ROAD, —VIJAYAPUR-586104.AAYAKAR BHAVAN,NEAR ALL INDIA RADIO |ATHANI ROAD, —VIJAYAPUR-586104.
2.THE SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD |OF DIRECT TAXESOF DIRECT TAXES
CENTRAL SECRETARIAT,
NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI -110001,REPRESENTED BY THE ASSESSMENT UNIT |
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, —NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE
(BY SRI. Y. V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 276)AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TQ)ISSUE A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE|! RESPONDENT AND 2 RESPONDENT, PERMITTING THEPETITIONER|TOFILE,EITHER ELECTRONICALLYOR.IN|PRINTED PAPER FORM OR ANY OTHER MODE AS THIS|HONOURABLE COURT MAY THINK FIT, THE RETURN OF INCOMEIN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S 148 OF THE ACT|BEARING DIN AND NOTICE NUMBER ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-23/104260655/7(1)DATED|O0/7-04-202INANNEXURE-BISSUED BY THE 1 RESPONDENT, WITHIN SUCH TIME AS THISHONOURABLE COURT MAY THINK FIT AND ETC., |
THISPETITION,COMINGON|FOR|PRELIMINARY|HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Y.V.Raviraj, learned counsel accepts notice for)respondents.
? In this writ petition, petitioner is seeking writ ofmandamus to the respondents to permit the petitioner to file return of income in response to notice issued underSection 148 of Income Tax Act, 1960.
‘3Having taken note of the averments made in|the|writpetition, In|identicalCAaASthis.CourtIn
-3-
W.P.No.201282/2022 disposed of on 23.06.2022 at para-8held as follows:
"8.The writ petition is partly allowed. Therespondents are directed to open the portal to enablethe petitioner to submit nis return of income making|a claim for deduction under Section 80P of the Act, and if for any reason the portal cannot be openea,the petitioner is permitted to file his return of incomein response to the notice under Section 148 of the|Act, physically, and the respondents are directed to receive the same and thereafter proceed further itnaccordance with law. It is needless to state that the|authorities have the powers to verify the details|uploaded. ©
4Under the circumstances, the present writ.petitionIS.alsodisposedofIn|terms|Of|theaforementionecdobservationmade|In.
W.P.No.201282/2022.
Sd/-|JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.