Case Law › High Court › Wp/2037/2022 Of Gandhi Securities And In...

Wp/2037/2022 Of Gandhi Securities And Investment Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4(1)(1), Mumbai And 3 Ors

High Court 02 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 May 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/2037/2022 Of Gandhi Securities And Investment Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4(1)(1), Mumbai And 3 Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

GAURIAMITGAEKWAD Digitally signedby GAURIAMITGAEKWADDate:2022.05.0610:17:02 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2037 OF 2022 Gandhi Securities and Investment Pvt. Ltd. ….Petitioner V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 4(1)(1), Mumbai and Ors. ….Respondents ---- Mr. Parth Parikh i/b. Economic Laws Practice for petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w. Ms. Krunali Satra and Ms. Mohinee Choughule forrespondents. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 2[nd] MAY 2022 N.R. BORKAR, JJ. P.C.: 1Mr. Parikh states that after the petition was filed the assessmentauthority has passed an assessment order dated 24[th] March 2022 withoutmaking any addition. Mr. Parikh, therefore, seeks leave of the Court towithdraw the petition. 2Petition dismissed as withdrawn. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.