Wp/20516/2005 Of Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. (Srts-1) v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
High Court
16 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/20516/2005 Of Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. (Srts-1) v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
16 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/20516/2005 Of Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. (Srts-1) v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF IVARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO:20516 OF 2005
Between:
Power Grid Corporation of lndia Ltd. (SRTS-1), M.C.H. Complex, R.P. Road,Secund e rabad-500 003, Rep. by its Deputy General l\,4anager (Finance) [tr,/ ]r. N.P.Rangan, aged about 49 yrs, S/o. Late Sri V.S. Narasimhan, ...pETtTtoNER
AND
1The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax (l/c), Circle 15(1), Aayakar Bhavan,L. B. Stadium Road, Basheerbadh, HyderbadL. B. Stadium Road, Basheerbadh, Hyderbad2The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 14(3), Aayakar Bhavan, L.B.Stadium Road, Basheerabad, Hyderabad,3The Commissioner of lncome Tax (TDS), Aayakar Bhavan, L.B. Stadium Road,Basheerabad' Hyderabad' Stadium Road, Basheerabad, Hyderabad,3The Commissioner of lncome Tax (TDS), Aayakar Bhavan, L.B. Stadium Road,Basheerabad' Hyderabad'
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be [pleased]to issue a writ, direction or order especially in the nature of writ of [Vlandamusdeclaring the notice dt. 8-9-2005 issued by the ['1 ]st Respondent treating thepetitioner as an assessee in default and directing the petitioner to submit the detailsof the bank accounts operated by the Petitioner and the list of Petitioner's debtors torecover a sum of Rs. 3,16,07,393/- and Rs. 2,70,95,7151- (totaling Rs. 5,87,03,108/-)for [the ][assessment years 2004-05 ][and ][2005-06 ][as ][being illegal, arbitrary, ][and]against the settled principles of law.
WPMP. NO: 26168 OF 2005
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to staythe collection of disputed taxes in a sum of Rs. 3,16,07,393/- and Rs. 2,70,95,7151-(Totaling Rs. 5,87,03,108/-) for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. RAVI
Counsel for Respondents: SRI S. R. ASHOK
Sr. SC FOR INCOME TAX
The Court made the following: ORDER
'lllll llONOt lt \lll I Sltl.,l sll( l'. \l.S.lt.\\1.\('ll.\]il)lii,\ Il.\o'\ rtrl't'Hl.t Ito\or R.\tlt.t. stit .,1. s I t('t. 1. .\\l \tt\ \ I I (;()t l)
\Vlll-f l'l11'l'l'lON No.20516 of 2(X)5
ORDIill, ['. ][tPer ]li,t,t blc' .\t i .lti:titL \l .\ IituttrrcItrrittIrtt lt.tto)
I-carned c(,Lrnscl lor pe-tiiioncr lilcd u lctter clt.ll-03-2020betorc the [ie0.istrrr (Juclicili). lli_qh [('oult ]lirr thc Statr- rl"le'langanu.lirdcrabaci statilrll Lhat tlrc caLrsc irr tlrc \\'r'it l'ctilion ras becorrrcin liuc Irro r-rs
Ilccordini,. thu sarrre . this \\lrit l)ctition is .lisrrrisscrl .rsir-,li'Ltcl.rroLts. \() J o:it\.ir-,li'Ltcl.rroLts. \() J o:it\.
As a scttLr.'1. ,lic ,ri:;e clllrrri'()Lrs l)clitiun:.,. il anr :crrtlinq. shulls,.ll ntl c ltlsccis,.ll ntl c ltlscci
SD/. CI] VENKATESHWARASSISTGISTRAR*4-SE CTIN OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To.'1. One CC to Sri S Flavi Advocate i. 5;; cc io [sti 5 ][n ][Asr,ok, ][sr' ] [for ][lnbome ][Tax ]3. Two CD [CoPies]T/BC
x
MSR,J&TA,J
DATED: 1610312020
ST41I(./a.o4IniiIiPfl2milo-LORDER
WP.No.20516 of 2005
DISMISSING THE WRIT PI=TITION ASINFRLJCTUOUS, WIT H [()UT ]COSTS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.