Wp/205/2007 Of Golobal Services Pvt. Ltd v. The Income-Tax Officer 9(1) - 4 And 2 Ors
High Court
06 Feb 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/205/2007 Of Golobal Services Pvt. Ltd v. The Income-Tax Officer 9(1) - 4 And 2 Ors
Date of order
06 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/205/2007 Of Golobal Services Pvt. Ltd v. The Income-Tax Officer 9(1) - 4 And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Rule is made absolute in the above terms and the petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
WRIT PETITON NO.205 OF 2007
WRIT PETITON NO.205 OF 2007
3 Global Services Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
The Income-tax Officer & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Soli Dastur, senior counsel with R. Murlidhar i/b.
M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co. for petitioner.
Mr.A.N.Kotangale for respondents.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard learned senior counsel for the
petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Rule, returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for
the respondents waives service. By consent taken up
for final hearing.
2. By this petition, the petitioner is
challenging the order dated 22nd January, 2007 passed
by the Income tax officer with regard to the
application for staying the demand of assessment
pertaining to the assessment year 2004-05. There is no
dispute with regard to the demand that the petitioner
has already filed an appeal before the Commissioner of
- = : 2 : = -
Income Tax (Appeals) and has also preferred an
application for stay before the Commissioner of Income
Tax (Admn). The learned counsel for the respondents
would not dispute that while passing the impugned order
dated 22nd January, 2007 the Income Tax Officer has not
followed the guidelines laid down in the Judgment of
K.E.C. International Ltd.V/s. B.R. Balakrishnan & Ors. reported in 251 I.T.R.158. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
this Court in the case of K.E.C. International Ltd.
V/s. B.R. Balakrishnan & Ors.
158
case, the impugned order dated 22nd January, 2007 is
quashed and set aside and the Income Tax Officer is at
liberty to pass an appropriate order in the light of
the guidelines laid down in the aforesaid Judgment.
However, we make it clear that the Income Tax Officer
shall not adopt any coercive methods till the
application which is pending before the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Adm.) is disposed of and if it is adverse
to the petitioner, the Income Tax Officer shall not
proceed to adopt any coercive steps for a period of
four weeks after the service of the said order on the
petitioner.
3. Rule is made absolute in the above terms and
the petition stands disposed of.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
- = : 3 : = -
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.