Case LawHigh Court › Wp/20782/2005 Of Sri J. Nrupender Rao (H...

Wp/20782/2005 Of Sri J. Nrupender Rao (Huf) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(3)

High Court 11 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/20782/2005 Of Sri J. Nrupender Rao (Huf) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(3)
Date of order
11 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/20782/2005 Of Sri J. Nrupender Rao (Huf) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(3), the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.RAVI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S.R.ASHOK & V R BADRI, SC FOR ITAX The Court made the following: ORDER /., /.; THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE N.TUI{ARAMJI wRIT PETITION No.2O782 OF [2OOs] ORDER: ftter Hon'ble Sri Justice P,SAM...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION NO: 20782 OF 2005 Between: Sri J. Nrupender Rao (HUF), Plot No381, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,Hyderabad. ...PET]TIONER AND 1. Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 2(3), Hyderabad. 2. Chief Commissioner of lncome Tax, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerabagh,Hyderabad.Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order especially in the nature of writ ofmandamus declaring the order daled 20-4-2005 issued by the 1st Respondentdirecting the petitioner to pay interest under Section 245 (6A) of the lncome TaxAct 1961 in a sum of Rs.5,59,9441 as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles oflaw. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 26551 oF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to staythe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to staythe collection of interest in a sum of Rs. 5,59,944/- quantified as payable by the1st Respondent by his order dated 20-4-2005 under Section 245 D(6A) of thelncome Tax Act, 1961 .1st Respondent by his order dated 20-4-2005 under Section 245 D(6A) of thelncome Tax Act, 1961 . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.RAVI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S.R.ASHOK & V R BADRI, SC FOR ITAX The Court made the following: ORDER /., /.; THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE N.TUI{ARAMJI wRIT PETITION No.2O782 OF [2OOs] ORDER: ftter Hon'ble Sri Justice P,SAM [KOSHY)] Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that [the]petitioner does not press the present writ petition further Recording the said submission, the writ [petition ][is]dismissed as not pressed. No order as to [costs.]if [any,]Consequently, miscellaneous petitions [pending, ]shall stand closed. SD/. G. SIREESHAASSISTANT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To 1. One CC to SRI S.RAVI, Advocate [OPUCI2. One CC to [S.R.ASHOK ][& ] [R BADRI']3. Two CD CoPiesPSKGJP sc FoR |TAX HIGH COURT DATED:1110112024 ORDER WP.No.20782 of 2005 [o][R][ lHE ][s14][ /e](J($.()17 nrn: n?4c) DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS. 5
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan