Case LawHigh Court › Wp/21358/2013 Of Madhya Pradesh State Ci...

Wp/21358/2013 Of Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Bhopal v. Commissioner, Of Income Tax (Tds)

High Court 29 Jan 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/21358/2013 Of Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Bhopal v. Commissioner, Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
29 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/21358/2013 Of Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Bhopal v. Commissioner, Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2014) decided the matter under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

29.01.2014 Shri Mukesh Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the respondents. Two broad reliefs have been claimed by the petitioner in this petition; first is to direct the respondent no.2 to issue certificate under section 197 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15 expeditiously. As regards this relief, we have no difficulty in directing the respondent no.2 to expedite the process for issuance of certificate under section 197 of the Act or to reject that request, as the case may be, expeditiously and in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner submits that further observations may be made by the Court that the said application be processed without being influenced by the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) Bhopal, dated 12.3.2013, annexure P/7, pertaining to previous years. We have already observed that the Authority is expected to decide the application pertaining to assessment year 2014-15 in accordance with law. Nothing more is required to be clarified. The second relief claimed by the petitioner is to assail the communication, annexure P/7. However, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, in all fairness, submitted that the petitioner will not press this relief in view of the subsequent events. In the circumstances, petition disposed of. (A.M.Khanwilkar) Chief Justice HS (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan