Wp/21519/2005 Of M/S.mahalaxmi Motors Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2 (1)
High Court
22 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/21519/2005 Of M/S.mahalaxmi Motors Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2 (1)
Date of order
22 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/21519/2005 Of M/S.mahalaxmi Motors Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2 (1), the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.21519 OF 2005
DATED: 22-11-2005
Between
M/s. Mahalaxmi Motors Limited
Rep. by its Managing Director,
Mahendra C. Mehta,
A-4/2, Chandralok Complex,
Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad – 500 003.
.. Petitioner
AND
The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 2(1), Aakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad – 500 001 & another
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.21519 OF 2005
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ananda Reddy)
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking certain refund of tax amount.But, however, it is represented by the learned senior counsel appearing for therespondents-Income Tax Department that the Department has issued a noticeto the petitioner proposing to implement the order of the Tribunal. Therefore, itis not appropriate for this Court to go into the merits of the rival contentions.Suffice it to close the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to file itsobjections before the assessing authority with reference to notice raising allpleas that are available to it under law, and if so raised, it is for the assessingauthority to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. It is stated that thepetitioner requires certain time for filing its objections to the notice. Hence, thepetitioner is granted three weeks time from the date of receipt of the notice forfiling its objections to the said notice and on receipt of such objections that arefiled by the petitioner, the assessing authority is directed to consider the sameand pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.
___________________________
Date:22-11-2005
PV
___________________________
S. ANANDA REDDY, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.