Wp/21524/2005 Of Mahalaxmi Motors Limited A-4/2, Chandralok v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1)
High Court
14 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/21524/2005 Of Mahalaxmi Motors Limited A-4/2, Chandralok v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1)
Date of order
14 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
1994-95
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/21524/2005 Of Mahalaxmi Motors Limited A-4/2, Chandralok v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1), the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Issue: However, since the claim of the assessee is that he did not receivethe same nor the said cheque was encashed, it is stated that a letter was addressedto the Reserve Bank of India on 21.10.2005 enquiring as to whether the said chequewas encashed or otherwise.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 21524 of 2005
Dated 14.11.2005
M/s.Mahalakshmi Motors Limited.
AND
..... petitioner
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 2(1)
Ayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 21524 of 2005
ORAL ORDER:(Per Sri S.Ananda Reddy,j)
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to issue a refundorder for Rs.22,03,364/- together with interest payable under Section 244-A of theIncome-Tax Act for the assessment year 1994-95.
In response to the notice issued by this Court, a counter affidavit is filed on behalf ofthe department stating that for the amount refundable for the concerned assessmentyear, a refund order was issued in favour of the assessee as per the refund orderdated 13.7.1995 by enclosing a cheque bearing No.A006520/B652000 in favour ofthe assessee. However, since the claim of the assessee is that he did not receivethe same nor the said cheque was encashed, it is stated that a letter was addressedto the Reserve Bank of India on 21.10.2005 enquiring as to whether the said chequewas encashed or otherwise. It is however stated that as soon as the reply is receivedfrom the Reserve Bank of India, the respondent department will take appropriateaction as to the refund or otherwise.
In view of the above statement made in the counter by the respondent authorities,the writ petition is disposed of directing the department to pass appropriate orderswithin a period of four weeks from today.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
(B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J)
Dated 14..11..2005
(S.ANANDA REDDY,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.