In Wp/2185/2010 Of Vodafone International Holdings B.v v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
PURTIPRASADPARAB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPARABDate: 2022.02.0911:00:58 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 2185 OF 2010
Vodafone International Holdings B.V. V/s.Assistant Director of Income TaxAnd Anr.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Ms. Fereshte Sethna a/w Mr. Mrunal Parekh and Mr. Hasmukh Ravaria i/b DMD Advocates for Petitioner.Mr. Arvind Pinto for Respondents-Revenue.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATED : 4[th] FEBRUARY, 2022
P.C. :
1.Ms. Sethna seeks leave to withdraw the petition for the reasons
mentioned in the praecipe dated 4[th] February, 2022 which is taken on record
and marked "X" for identification.
2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue