Case LawHigh Court › Wp/22008/2000 Of M/S. Prefab Gratings Lt...

Wp/22008/2000 Of M/S. Prefab Gratings Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Jun 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/22008/2000 Of M/S. Prefab Gratings Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/22008/2000 Of M/S. Prefab Gratings Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Petition No.22008 of 2000 ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This writ petition is filed challenging the order, dated25.09.2000, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, refusing to recall M.P.No.40/Hyd/2000 inI.T.A.No.21/H/1996. The necessity for us to deal with the matterindependently is obviated, on account of the fact thatI.T.A.No.21/Hyd/1996 filed against the very order, is disposed of byus. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. Thereshall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous petition filed in this writ petition shall alsostand disposed of. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. _____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. Date:25.06.2014 GJ
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan