Wp/2/2013 Of Mr. C. Kalyan v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax -1
High Court
11 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/2/2013 Of Mr. C. Kalyan v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax -1
Date of order
11 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/2/2013 Of Mr. C. Kalyan v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax -1, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOWrit Petition No. 2 of 2013Dated: 11-02-2013…Petitioner…Respondents.
Between:C. Kalyan.AndThe Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Hyderabad and others.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition No. 2 of 2013
Oral order(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Smt Indrani, learned counsel representing SriChalla Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause inthis writ petition does not survive for adjudication, since the writpetition is directed against the order of the 2[nd] respondent declining togrant relief in stay application filed by the petitioner pending appealbefore the CIT (Appeals); however the appeal itself has now beendisposed of.
In view of the submission on behalf of the petitioner, the writpetition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
11[th] February, 2013
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.