Wp/22042/2023 Of Acer India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/22042/2023 Of Acer India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/22042/2023 Of Acer India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byKIRANKUMAR RLocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
-WRIT PETITION NO. 22042 OF 2023 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. ACER INDIA PVT LTD., NO. 13, 6TH FLOOR, EMBASSY HEIGHTS, MAGRATH ROAD, NEXT TO HOSMAT HOSPITAL, BENGALURU - 560 025. A COMPANY ACT, 1956 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR- LEGAL MR SARGAM JAIN. NO. 13, 6TH FLOOR, EMBASSY HEIGHTS, MAGRATH ROAD, NEXT TO HOSMAT HOSPITAL, BENGALURU - 560 025. A COMPANY ACT, 1956 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR- LEGAL MR SARGAM JAIN.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 1(1) (1), ROOM NO. 215, 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. CIRCLE- 1(1) (1), ROOM NO. 215, 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095.
2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME0TAX -1 BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. INCOME0TAX -1 BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095.
3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CENTER, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU - 560 500. CENTRALISED PROCESSING CENTER, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU - 560 500.
4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME -TAX (SYSTEMS)
ARA CENTRE, GROUND FLOOR, E-2, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION,
NEW DELHI - 110 055.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. MANASA ANANTHAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH REFUND AN TOTAL AMOUNT OF RS. 150,67,30,003/- , COMPRISING OF (a) RS. 39,09,34,671/- FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12, AS DETERMINED VIDE ORDER DTD 09.05.23 BEARING NO. OGE/260A/DCIT-C-1(1)(1)/2023-24/2 (ANNEXURE-A), ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs -
"(i) To direct the respondents to forthwith refund an total amount of Rs.150,67,30,003/-, comprising of (a) Rs.39,09,34,671/- for assessment year 2011-12, as determined vide order dated 09.05.2023 bearing No.OGE/260A/DCIT-C-1(1)(1)/2023-24/2 (Annexure-A); (b) Rs. 26,70,67,760/- for the assessment year 2012-13, as determined vide order dtd 24.04.23 bearing No. OGE/ITAT/DCIT-C1(1)(1)/2023-24/2 (Annexure-B); (c)Rs. 44,56,81,303/- for the assessment year 2013-14, as determined vide order dated 24.04.2023 bearing No.OGE/ITAT/DCIT-C1(1)(1)/2023-24/3 (ANNEXURE-'C'); (d) Rs.36,29,56,524/- for the assessment year 2014-15, as determined vide order dated 24.04.2023 bearing No.OGE/ITAT/DCIT-C1(1)(1)/2023-24/3 (ANNEXURE-D); (e) Rs.4,00,89,745/- for the
assessment year 2017-18, as determined vide the order dated 31.07.2023 bearing No. OGE/254/DCIT/C-1(1)(1)/BLR/2023-24, (Annexure-E) along with applicable interest until payment of the refund.
(ii). Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. On instructions, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the respondents would release / disburse the refund payable to the petitioner in terms of Annexures- A to E pursuant to Annexures-F to K, after due verification, on or before 15.04.2024.
4. Submission is placed on record.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose off this petition directing the concerned respondent to release / disburse the refund payable in favour of the petitioner in terms of Annexures-A to E and pursuant
2. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. On instructions, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the respondents would release / disburse the refund payable to the petitioner in terms of Annexures- A to E pursuant to Annexures-F to K, after due verification, on or before 15.04.2024.
4. Submission is placed on record.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose off this petition directing the concerned respondent to release / disburse the refund payable in favour of the petitioner in terms of Annexures-A to E and pursuant
to Annexures-F to K and without reference to Annexure-L dated 18.09.2023 on or before 15.04.2024 along with applicable interest.
6. Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed off.
Sd/- JUDGE
HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.