Wp/2210/1991 Of Vinod Quality Papers Bombay v. Smt.anita Desai. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay
High Court
08 Aug 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2210/1991 Of Vinod Quality Papers Bombay v. Smt.anita Desai. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay
Date of order
08 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/2210/1991 Of Vinod Quality Papers Bombay v. Smt.anita Desai. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and the Rule stands discharged.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2210 OF 1991
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M/s.Vinod Quality Papers
Bombay ...Petitioners
V/s.
Smt. Amta Desai ...Respondents.
Mr.M.H.Patil with Ms.Aasifa Khan for the
Petitioners.
Dr.P.Daniel with Mr.G.Hariharan for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 8th August, 2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner
and the learned counsel for the Respondents. The
learned counsel for the Petitioner states that with
regard to the statutory validity of Section 272(1)(B)
of the Income Tax Act, statutory validity has been
already upheld by the three different High Courts. In
view thereof, the learned counsel for the Petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the above Petition. The
Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and the Rule
stands discharged.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue