Case LawHigh Court › Wp/22152/2005 Of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam L...

Wp/22152/2005 Of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam v. The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam And 2

High Court 13 Oct 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/22152/2005 Of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam v. The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam And 2
Date of order
13 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/22152/2005 Of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam v. The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam And 2, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU WRIT PETITION No.22152 OF 2005 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar) Sri Ch. Viswanath, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Sri A.V.Krishna Koundinya, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Since the same is not opposed by learned Standing Counsel for the Income-Tax, permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR _______________________________ JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU Dsh 63 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU W.P. No.22152 OF 2005(Order of the Division Bench delivered by Hon'ble Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar) Dated: 13.10.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan