Case Law › High Court › Wp/2232/2005 Of Pawankumar Variyaldas Ma...

Wp/2232/2005 Of Pawankumar Variyaldas Makhija v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors

High Court 25 Apr 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

25 Apr 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/2232/2005 Of Pawankumar Variyaldas Makhija v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: DATED : 25th April 2005.P.C. :----.On the motion made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, petitioner is allowed to withdrawthis petition with liberty to prosecute his appeal.All rival contentions are kept open..Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved as aforesaid with no order as...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATEJURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2232 OF 2005 Shri Psawankumar VariyaldasMakhija.... Petitioner.V/s.The Commissioner of Income-taxand others.... Respondents.Deepak Puranik for the petitioner.A.S.Rao for the respondents. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 25th April 2005.P.C. :----.On the motion made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, petitioner is allowed to withdrawthis petition with liberty to prosecute his appeal.All rival contentions are kept open..Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved as aforesaid with no order as tocosts.*****

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.