Case LawHigh Court › Wp/22430/2014 Of M/S. A.p. Beverages Cor...

Wp/22430/2014 Of M/S. A.p. Beverages Corporation Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I

High Court 06 Aug 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/22430/2014 Of M/S. A.p. Beverages Corporation Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
Date of order
06 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/22430/2014 Of M/S. A.p. Beverages Corporation Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENTTHE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.22430 OF 2014 DATED: 06-08-2014 Between: M/s. A.P. Beverages Corporation Limited,Nampally, Hyderabad … Petitioner And The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,3[rd] Floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabadand others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.22430 OF 2014 ORDER:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) The writ petition is heard and finally decided by the followingorder. The points agitated before us may be agitated before theCommissioner of Income Tax, Appeals. As we are told that a regularappeal has been preferred, all points are kept open. The petitioner shall make a deposit of Rs.200.00 crores(Rupees two hundred crores only) within a period of four weeks fromdate, without prejudice, subject to the result of the appeal. In the eventthe petitioner succeeds, the amount so deposited would be refundedor adjusted against other liabilities, if any. We therefore keep theimpugned notice in abeyance and it will abide by the result of theappeal. The petitioner would be free to operate the bank accounts,leaving Rs.200.00 crores in balance either in a single account or inmore than one account. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Pendingmiscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No order as tocosts. ______________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 06-08-2014Svv
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan