Wp/22431/2021 Of Dr. K.a. Ravi Varma Prasad v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD(Special Originat Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FI\IE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTilEOruANSING RAO NANDIKONOA WRIT PETITIO N NO:22431 0F 2021 Between: Dr. K.A Ravi Vgrma-pra_sad, S/g, [^Sqgbq Raju,.Occ. Dentist, Aged about 45ye..ars.,.R/9 Prithvi-604, Survey^No 79, My Home NawaO*eepi, ti",r Hii;;hye..ars.,.R/9 Prithvi-604, Survey^No 79, My Home NawaO*eepi, ti",r Hii;;hCity. Madhapur. Hyderabad-500081 (T S.)...PETITIONER...PETITIONER AND 1. Principal chief commissioner of rncome Tax, Andhra pradesh and^ [[Tetqn.Salt ]][[1oth Ftoor, ] [Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][ [Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[Towers, A.C. ]][CrirOi, nvJLrid#E6OO&]]2. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Unit-lv. tiru;ati.tiru;ati.^ [[Tetqn.Salt ]][[1oth Ftoor, ] [Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][ [Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[Towers, A.C. ]][CrirOi, nvJLrid#E6OO&]]2. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Unit-lv. tiru;ati.tiru;ati. ^ [[Tetqn.Salt ]][[1oth Ftoor, ] [Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][ [Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[Btock, ][tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[tT ][Towers, A.C. ]][[Towers, A.C. ]]2. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Unit-lv. tiru;ati.tiru;ati.2. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Assistant Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Director of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.of Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Unit-lv. tiru;ati.tiru;ati. Income Tax, Unit-lv. tiru;ati.Unit-lv. tiru;ati.tiru;ati.Unit-lv. tiru;ati.tiru;ati.tiru;ati.3- lnspector of Police, Ramagiri Circte, Anantapui Distrlct.lnspector of Police, Ramagiri Circte, Anantapui Distrlct. Circte, Anantapui Distrlct.4. Assistant commissioner of rncome Tax, centrar circle, centrar circre-i(4),Hyderabad.Hyderabad. 5. !-lnion of lndia, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North Brock,New Delhi....RESPONDENTSNew Delhi....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may bepleased to lssue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particurarry in the natureof writ of Mandamus- a) Decrare the action of the Respondents in seizingRs.1,27,00,000/- of the Petitioners tvloney vide panchanama dated 21to212019 asillegal and contrary to the provisions of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 ard lndianPenal Cod-e, 1 860 and Criminat procedure Code, 1973. b) Direct theRespondents to release Rs.1 ,27,00,000/- to the petitioner from its custody. c)Restrain the Respondents from conducting any further enquiry with respect to {hemoney seized vide Panchanama dated 21to2t201g. d) rmpose Heavy costs onthe Respondents for the illegality committed by them II lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci cumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in supportlof the petifion, the High Co.rrt may be pleased todirect the Respondents not to take any coercive steps zgainst the Petitionerpending disposal of the writ petitionthe affidavit filed in supportlof the petifion, the High Co.rrt may be pleased todirect the Respondents not to take any coercive steps zgainst the Petitionerpending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. ROHIT POGULA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2&4: Ms. M. KIRANMAVEE II lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci cumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in supportlof the petifion, the High Co.rrt may be pleased todirect the Respondents not to take any coercive steps zgainst the Petitionerpending disposal of the writ petitionthe affidavit filed in supportlof the petifion, the High Co.rrt may be pleased todirect the Respondents not to take any coercive steps zgainst the Petitionerpending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. ROHIT POGULA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2&4: Ms. M. KIRANMAVEE (sc FoR TNCoMETAX ) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI GADI PRAVEEN XLMAR, DY. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI [P.SAM ] ii //AND/i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE / WRIT PETITION No.22431 2O2l ORDER: @et Hon'bte [sri ][Justitt ][P.Sam Koshg)] Today, when the matter [is ][taken ][up ][for ][hearing, ][Mr'Rohit] Pogula, learned counsel for [the petitioner prays ][for withdrawal ][of ][the]instant writ petition. 2. As prayed for, the instant [r.r'rit ][petition stands ][dismissed ][as]withdrawn. No order as to [costs.] As a sequel, miscellaneous [applications pending ][if ][any, ][shall]stand closed. SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBAA SISTANT REGISTRAR t .t I /ffRUE COPY' i SECTION OFFICER To, To,t1. One CCto SRI. ROHIT POGULA, [Advocate][o]UC]2. OneCCto t\r6.M. KIRANMAYEE( [I]|\,4ETAX ) toPUCl3. One CCto SRIGADI PRAVEEN [KUMAR, ] [ SOLICITOR GENERAL OF]IrNDrA{OPUCI4. Two CCs to GP [F]OR HOME, High [Cou( ][for the State ][of ][Telangana, at]{ Hyderabad 5. Two CD Copies BM ij %- II I I { i t I l 1 jiIiiIIl HIGH COURTII DATED:1210312025t 2 4 SEP [,Uf]",,.'.t\:. \$..,",+--l=::::- ORDER WP.No.22431 ot 2021 -rj DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS W]THDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS (2